TheTippingPoint
12-10-08, 08:53 PM
As Greg approaches the end of chemo in which he appears to be responding well despite advanced metastasis of disease, I am curious about post-op surgeries. Greg went out of order by having an L-RPLND first, then chemo.
My main question is should we ask about and/or advocate for a second, full open bi-lateral RPLND? Greg wants to treat this disease aggressively, and if the chemo's worked well, we wondered if the mammoth of RPLND would be a good idea or overkill...
Greg's doc has already discussed the possibility of surgically removing any remaining masses (at this point, we hope/think they will be just dead tissue since his markers are almost back to a normal range), which looking at the NCCN guidelines, appears to be the protocol if there are residual masses, but is there any value in another RPLND after the resectioning of leftover stuff?
Thanks
My main question is should we ask about and/or advocate for a second, full open bi-lateral RPLND? Greg wants to treat this disease aggressively, and if the chemo's worked well, we wondered if the mammoth of RPLND would be a good idea or overkill...
Greg's doc has already discussed the possibility of surgically removing any remaining masses (at this point, we hope/think they will be just dead tissue since his markers are almost back to a normal range), which looking at the NCCN guidelines, appears to be the protocol if there are residual masses, but is there any value in another RPLND after the resectioning of leftover stuff?
Thanks