Announcement

Announcement Module
Collapse
No announcement yet.

my seond coming up

Page Title Module
Move Remove Collapse
X
Conversation Detail Module
Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by surfhb View Post
    Both UCLA and USC recommend the RPLND and I may be able to get it next week.
    Sounds like you are in California, then, Just be aware that depending on path results of the RPLND, you may need more chemo going forward. Hope you don't.
    Dave
    Last edited by Davepet; 01-12-19, 04:21 PM.
    Jan, 1975: Right I/O, followed by RPLND
    Dec, 2009: Left I/O, followed by 3xBEP

    Comment


    • #32
      Well that’s what worries me about pure EC. Maybe I should just start chemo and finish this.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by surfhb View Post
        The PET/CT came back with a possible spread to my lower abdomen. RPLND is on the table right now.
        What, exactly did the scan report find? A slightly enlarged node or something big? I woud consider an email to Doc E if there is any doubt about the need for further action.

        Jan, 1975: Right I/O, followed by RPLND
        Dec, 2009: Left I/O, followed by 3xBEP

        Comment


        • #34
          Embryonal carcinoma 2.1cm tumor extends into rete testes lymphovascular invasion indentified. PT2 pNx

          Intensely FDG avid (SUVmax 7.4) left para-aortic lymph node measuring 9 x 11 mm concerning for metastasis. This has increased in size since 6/7/2017 when it measured 8 x 9 mm.

          Markers are still normal stage IIA so according to NCCN guidelines nerve sparing RPLND is the recommenders treatment.

          Once again my concern is 100% EC. They are saying the next steps are how much cancer they find.

          Comment


          • #35
            The size of your 9x11 mm lymph node suggests some further treatment, but only by .1 mm. I'd contact Dr E & see what he thinks. Did it "light up " in the PET portion of the scan?
            Jan, 1975: Right I/O, followed by RPLND
            Dec, 2009: Left I/O, followed by 3xBEP

            Comment


            • #36
              Well UCLA and USC both say RPLND and on the west coast they are certainly expert centers. My oncologist spent time at Dana Faber for a few years also so she has the east coast connections. All saying RPLND and put an end to this.

              I guess I could email my information over and see what happens? What could it hurt but I do trust these people with my life and the work they have done thus far has been nothing short of perfect.

              If you are reading this Dr. Mark Litwin at UCLA is the man you want to see and my oncologist Dr. Alexandra Drakaki will both be the best doctors you have ever met.

              Dave I guess it did light up that area or we maybe wouldn’t be having this conversation?

              Anyone else?

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by surfhb View Post
                Dave I guess it did light up that area or we maybe wouldn’t be having this conversation?
                Not necessarily, my understanding is that PET isn't particularly useful with EC, so a lack of it lighting up isn't a pass, but if it did,than you have a better indication that treatment might be needed. I would ask for a copy of the report or even a CD of the scan.
                Jan, 1975: Right I/O, followed by RPLND
                Dec, 2009: Left I/O, followed by 3xBEP

                Comment


                • #38
                  The case was sent to Einhorn. He replied

                  “I agree with everything including your high regard for Mark Litwin. Agree of course with RPLND. Ultimate cure rate should be close to 100%.”

                  Guess I’ve got my path mapped out for beating this once and for all.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X