Hi there,
I received staging information from my urologist this last Thursday. Evidently I am right on the border between stage IIA and IIB, technically IIB due to one lymph node being slightly over 2.0cm (2.1x1.4cm) and slightly elevated beta HCG following orchiectomy. (I have not seen the blood test results personally, but I believe he said b-HCG was 10 before orchiectomy and 4 a week post-op when it should have been ~0.)
20% Seminoma
70% Embryonal carcinoma
10% Teratoma
I received a chest X-ray last week that I am hoping is negative, and I am seeing an oncologist for the first time today. My guess is that he will recommend chemo regardless of the X-ray results.
I guess my question/concern is on RPLND vs. chemo in this instance. It's my understanding that we would do chemo in hopes of reducing the lymph nodes to normal size, hopefully killing everything, and then going on a surveillance regimen. If the chemo is not effective or the lymph nodes start getting bigger again, it is probably the teratoma that has spread (small likelihood) and then it's time for RPLND. I've heard that this surgery is much more difficult post-chemo. Does anyone have experience with this?
Should I be seeking a second opinion? Talking to the experts at IU or Sloan-Kettering?
I'm woefully ignorant of chemo at this point. Is the chemo treatment likely the same in this case no matter who you talk to or where you receive treatment? It seems like there is a standard playbook.
Thanks for your advice/thoughts.
I received staging information from my urologist this last Thursday. Evidently I am right on the border between stage IIA and IIB, technically IIB due to one lymph node being slightly over 2.0cm (2.1x1.4cm) and slightly elevated beta HCG following orchiectomy. (I have not seen the blood test results personally, but I believe he said b-HCG was 10 before orchiectomy and 4 a week post-op when it should have been ~0.)
20% Seminoma
70% Embryonal carcinoma
10% Teratoma
I received a chest X-ray last week that I am hoping is negative, and I am seeing an oncologist for the first time today. My guess is that he will recommend chemo regardless of the X-ray results.
I guess my question/concern is on RPLND vs. chemo in this instance. It's my understanding that we would do chemo in hopes of reducing the lymph nodes to normal size, hopefully killing everything, and then going on a surveillance regimen. If the chemo is not effective or the lymph nodes start getting bigger again, it is probably the teratoma that has spread (small likelihood) and then it's time for RPLND. I've heard that this surgery is much more difficult post-chemo. Does anyone have experience with this?
Should I be seeking a second opinion? Talking to the experts at IU or Sloan-Kettering?
I'm woefully ignorant of chemo at this point. Is the chemo treatment likely the same in this case no matter who you talk to or where you receive treatment? It seems like there is a standard playbook.
Thanks for your advice/thoughts.
Comment