My story, post-orchiectomy

[ChrisNY]

Hello everyone,

My name’s Chris and I’m writing from NY (as my username no doubt reveals). I’m an active, healthy (besides the obvious) 34-year-old.

I’d first like to thank you all for the community you’ve created on here. I’ve been lurking the past few weeks, and it’s been both informative and encouraging to see all the support you offer each other. Indeed, it’s kept me sane during this difficult period in my life, which I’d like to share with you:

After finding a small lump on my right testicle in mid-December, doctor visits and tests brought me to a Right I/O on February 9. The surgery went well and I’m recovering just fine. Met with my urologist (who performed the surgery) yesterday to review the pathology report (sorry for its length, but figured I’d include everything):

Microscopic Diagnosis:
RIGHT TESTES AND SPERMATIC CORD, ORCHIECTOMOY:
Germ cell tumor/embryonal carcinoma, measuring 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.7 (see synoptic report).
Testicular atrophy is present adjacent to embryonal carcinoma.
Spermatic cord lipoma.

Immunohistochemistry:
CD30: Positive in tumor cells.
OCT3/4: Pending, will be reported in an addendum.
PLAP: Positive in tumor cells.
AE1/AE3: Focal weak staining in tumor cells.

SYNOPTIC REPORT: GERM CELL OR SEX CORD-STROMAL TUMOR OF THE TESTIS

Specimen laterality: Right.
Tumor focality: Unifocal.
Tumor size: 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.7 cm (gross measurement).
Histologic type: Embryonal carcinoma
Tumor extension: Tumor limited to testis.
Margins
Spermatic cord margin: Uninvolved by carcinoma.
Other margin(s): Uninvolved by carcinoma, tunica vaginalis.
Lymphatic-vascular invasion: Present.
Regional Lymph Nodes: Not submitted.
Histologic subtype of germ cell tumor in involved lymph nodes: N/A.
Additional findings: Germ cell neoplasm in situ.
AJCC pathologic staging: pT2 pNX

Pre-orchiectomy serum tumor markers (performed on 01/19/2021):
Serum marker studies: within normal limits.

Serum tumor markers: S0

Gross Description:

“Right testis and spermatic cord.� A 37 g, 3.5 x 2.5 x 2.2 cm intact testis with a 3.5 x 0.9 x 0.4 cm attached epididymis and a 8.1 x 1.0 cm attached spermatic cord. The tunica vaginalis is intact, inked. Tissue is bivalve to show gray-white, smooth, glistening, intact tunica albuginea. Sectioning shows a 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.7 cm tan-brown, focally soft, well delineated lesion which is within .1 cm of the tunica of the albuginea and tail of epididymis, is within 10.5 cm of the spermatic cord margin. Remaining testis shows orange soft seminiferous tubules that can easily be teased. Additionally at the proximal margin is a 2.8 x 1.4 x 1.2 cm fatty, intact portion of adipose tissue attached to the spermatic cord. Cut surface is yellow, homogenous. RS as follows:

1. proximal spermatic cord margin
2. mid spermatic cord, adipose tissue
3. distal spermatic cord
4-6. lesion in its entirety, adjacent normal parenchyma, tunica albuginea, tunica vaginalis, possible rete testis, tail of epididymis
7. additional normal parenchyma, epididymis lms


I’m trying to be optimistic about all the encouraging signs: I have no symptoms, my blood results are normal, the tumor was small (even smaller than the ultrasound suggested), there was no spermatic cord involvement, and my Dr said the tumor was confined to the membrane surrounding the testicle itself (it apparently didn’t penetrate inward).

But I’m also concerned with the cell type of 100% embryonal carcinoma (apparently rare and aggressive) and the presence of LVI.

I’d of course welcome any comments, but I have two questions I’m particularly interested in:

1. My Dr sort of downplayed the presence of LVI, saying he sees that practically every time. Based on my research, however, LVI is often enough negative, even in 100% EC, and it’s definitely a better sign to not have it.

2. The pathologist staged me at pT2 pNX, which confused both me and my Dr. He said he checked with two of his colleagues, re-checked the official staging guidelines, and they all said there was nothing on my pathology report to support the Stage 2 identification (and apparently the pathologist will be unavailable to clarify until next week). What instead will show my exact stage is the results of the CT scan, which I hope to have next week. Maybe the pathologist noted the 100% EC and LVI and simply had to provide her own guess about spread?

Thank you in advance for any insights you can offer and I wish you all a great weekend.

Best,
Chris

[FBCoachC]

Sounds like your CT scan will be very important. If enlarged lymph nodes, they offer 3xBEP chemo. It sucks, but nothing to be afraid of. If not, survelience.

[Axel]

Hello Chris,

Welcome to the forum. Judging from the size of the tumor and the fact that it hasn't invaded tunica albuginea yet (let alone tunica vaginalis) it seems you caught it quite early and reacted as fast as possible! This is all good news. It's very likely that all the cancer is already out of you, although we can't be sure yet. The upcoming CT results will bring more clarity.

Actually, If it wasn't for the LVI, this report would be as good as it could possibly get in this situation.

Q1: Yes, it would be better if there was no LVI, statistically. But still, the presense of LVI doesn't mean it's certain that the cancer has spread - far from it. Maybe your doctor didn't want you to get too worked up and worried before you have the CT results.

Q2: "pT2 pNX" sounds like a correct classification of your case from your pathologist. It is exactly the status of the lymphovascular invasion that can upstage the T category from T1 (LVI absent) to T2 (LVI present) in an otherwise organ confined tumor. However, the T category is not the cancer stage. "pT2" does not mean you have stage 2 testicular cancer, these are different classifications. The TNM stage can be assessed after they take a look at the closeby lymph nodes. For example, if the CT doesn't show anything of concern there - you get "pT2 cN0 M0 S0" which is classic stage 1b TC.

Even if the cancer has spread, there are a lot of very effective treatments. EC has a high chance of being cured with platinum-based drugs, so at this point be optimistic and don't let the fear take over. You will overcome this.

[Davepet]

As FBCoach said, the CT scan is vital, I’m surprised it wasn't arraigned in that rather long period between discovery & surgery? Also, why did they wait so long for the surgery? The combination of embryional (which while not as common as seminoma, is not really rare, either) with LVI makes the decision of further treatment a bit more difficult. If the CT is clear, surveillance should be an option , some guys elect to get a single round of BEP to improve the odds. Lets see what that CT tells us, & go from there.

[ChrisNY]

I really appreciate all these replies, everyone. These messages have really helped take the edge off the anxiety this past week.

Dave, to answer your question, I found the lump myself in mid-December and, between the holidays and my request to see a male doctor, the soonest they could fit me in for an exam was early January (though in retrospect, I’m sure if I were more clear and urgent in communicating that there was a bizarre lump on my testicle, they would have seen me sooner). From there, things moved quickly (blood work, ultrasound, meeting with my urologist, getting the surgery).

I’m happy to report that my CT scans this past week came up completely clean, which means I’m officially stage 1B, correct?

Based on my research, however, the 100% EC and the LVI means I’m “high-risk� stage 1B, about a 50% chance of relapse. Frankly, that’s not a coin toss I wish to make, so I’m resigned to getting the 1 course of BEP, which should bring those odds way down to lower single digits.

My urologist told me he has a monthly meeting with oncologists and other professionals next week, at which time he’s going to present my case. I suspect he’ll use the occasion to match me with an oncologist who’s best suited to treat me.

I’ll definitely have the option of 1 x BEP, right? To what extent, if any, will I have to really advocate for myself and convince them that I’ve done my homework and arrived at an informed decision?

Also, what would you say is a typical amount of time between the Right I/O and the chemo (adjuvant in my case)? Would six or seven weeks be okay? It probably wouldn’t be until then, by the time I meet with an oncologist, schedule the chemo, and get my 2nd Covid shot (scheduled for March 25th). For what it’s worth, my urologist said they’d want to wait to administer any further treatment anyway, just to be sure I’ve recovered from my Right I/O.

Lastly, even though my pelvic, abdomen, and chest CT scans are clean, should I really push for a brain scan as well, given that EC often metastasizes hematogenously? My urologist said my oncologist would decide, but either way my insurance might not cover it because I have no symptoms.