I was diagnosed after a right side Orchirectomy of haveing pure Seminoma. I am in the Navy on flight status so the results were verified at a lab in D.C. and then a third time at Portsmouth Naval medical facility in VA. All three said pure seminoma.
My AFP initially was 11.4 but then prior to surgery (4 days later) it was 4.4. The CT scan and chest xray were clean. 7 weeks later, I am now in Portsmouth and the AFP was 10.7. The Doctors are a little cofused with the 4.4 I think. The only thing the 11.4 and 10.7 had in common were that I had consumed alcohol within 3 days or so of the tests. Another factor could be that 6 years ago I was treated with INH and it almost caused liver failure. LFTs were off the charts. (10 times normal) Maybe it could have caused some liver damage or maybe it reacts differently to alcohol now?
The doctors are saying if the next AFP number is still high. (they consider over 10.0 high) they wand to do 2 or 3 cycles of VIP. (BEP can cause lung toxicity and as a "Flyer" it would keep me out of my job much longer) If it is decreasing they will treat as pure seminoma)
Does this train of thought make sense to you guys or should I question this thought process further. I am prepared to do chemo if that is best, but I don't want to do 3 cycles if it is not needed.
Thanks
Jon
My AFP initially was 11.4 but then prior to surgery (4 days later) it was 4.4. The CT scan and chest xray were clean. 7 weeks later, I am now in Portsmouth and the AFP was 10.7. The Doctors are a little cofused with the 4.4 I think. The only thing the 11.4 and 10.7 had in common were that I had consumed alcohol within 3 days or so of the tests. Another factor could be that 6 years ago I was treated with INH and it almost caused liver failure. LFTs were off the charts. (10 times normal) Maybe it could have caused some liver damage or maybe it reacts differently to alcohol now?
The doctors are saying if the next AFP number is still high. (they consider over 10.0 high) they wand to do 2 or 3 cycles of VIP. (BEP can cause lung toxicity and as a "Flyer" it would keep me out of my job much longer) If it is decreasing they will treat as pure seminoma)
Does this train of thought make sense to you guys or should I question this thought process further. I am prepared to do chemo if that is best, but I don't want to do 3 cycles if it is not needed.
Thanks
Jon
Comment