Testicular Cancer Support Forum - Chemotherapy Treatments, Nausea, Vomiting, Success Stories, Radiation, Self Exams, Neulasta, Aloxi, Zofran Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Register to the Testicular Cancer Support Site for Free Calendar Find other Testicular Cancer (TC-Cancer.com) Members Search for Testicular Cancer Posts, Chemotherapy Treatments, Success Stories, Questions and more! Return to the Testicular Cancer Support Forums Homepage  



Go Back   TC-Cancer.com - Testicular Cancer Information & Support Forum > Community Forums > Testicular Cancer Research Library

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes


  #1  
Old 07-25-10, 05:02 AM
Paul54's Avatar
Paul54 Paul54 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Age: 57
Posts: 1,583
Alternatives to 3xBEP in Good Prognosis GCT-You Bet Your Life-Editorial

Many of us continue participating in the forum for, among other reasons, the hope of being able to rejoice at the discovery of breakthoughs in diagnosis and treatment that would reduce suffering and save lives. Most of the time, though, we are thankful that treatments exist that help keep the survival rate to 95%. The below link is to an editorial, which I think is accessible without any sort of login by a friend of the TC community, Dr. Craig Nichols, that confirms that 3xBEP is state-of-the-art. While I hope I don't have to endure any chemo, there is some satisfaction that it is there if I need it. Note references to work by Drs. Einhorn, Jewett, and Horwich, including some recent papers.

http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/djq266v1
__________________
Diagnosis: 05Sept07 Right I/O: 13Sept07 Seminoma IB
Surveillance: All clear: 16Aug2010; Next check 14Feb2011=Valentine's Day

Visit my Philly 2010 LIVESTRONG Challenge Page
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-25-10, 01:58 PM
Smartie's Avatar
Smartie Smartie is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Weston-super-Mare, UK
Age: 43
Posts: 2,079
Paul - thank you very much for finding and posting this. I believe the article has big implications for the forum. Specifically, we always tell people that 3xBEP and 4xEP are equally effective, but Dr Nichols disagrees:

Quote:
[...]in terms of routine clinical practice, there must be a compelling
medical reason to use etoposide and cisplatin for four cycles rather than BEP × 3 (eg, advanced age, substantial renal insufficiency,
demonstrable clinically significant pulmonary compromise), and these two regimens should not be viewed as equally effective options. (italics mine)
Also, we often -quite rightly - tell people that delays in chemo treatment are associated with poorer outcomes. Until now, the only source I could find for this was the interview (about ten years old) with Dr Nichols on the TCRC. Now we can also point to this far more recent and officially published article, and to these words:

Quote:
There is now sufficient evidence to say that deviation from standard BEP × 3 is a potentially life-threatening decision and, therefore, requires a corresponding life-threatening reason to drop bleomycin or to extend the 21-day schedule or to tinker with the etoposide dose. (italics mine)
All in all, a remarkable publication with far-reaching ramifications for TC patients who are considering their options.
__________________
Nick


Embryonal Carcinoma; Seminoma.
Right I/O August 2001.
Surveillance August - December 2001.
Relapse: December 2001. Stage III, mets in lymph nodes and lung.
3xBEP Dec 2001 - March 2002.
Complications: Neutropaenic sepsis during cycles 1 & 3. I/V antibiotics and isolation.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-25-10, 03:25 PM
TCdoc's Avatar
TCdoc TCdoc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 190
Actually if you look at reference 7 the french authors state that there is no significant difference between x3 BEP and x4 EP.
__________________
16 Dec 09 2.7 cm mass
18 Dec 09 Right I/O
Mixed germ cell - EC, chorio, seminoma
5 Jan 10 CT scan - negative; Stage 1b
3 Mar 10 CT scan - positive nodes; Stage IIa
29th March to 11th June 4xEP
Neutropenic sepsis after cycle 4 of EP
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-26-10, 02:30 AM
Davepet's Avatar
Davepet Davepet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCdoc View Post
Actually if you look at reference 7 the french authors state that there is no significant difference between x3 BEP and x4 EP.
Where did you see that, TCdoc? All I saw was:

Quote:
This question has been addressed formally by a random-
ized trial conducted in France (7), in which it was concluded that
standard BEP × 3 was the superior regimen and that further inves-
tigation of this issue was not warranted; standard BEP × 3 has thus
become the recommended therapy for good-prognosis dissemi-
nated germ cell tumors throughout Europe and in Canada.
Which seems to say the opposite...
Could you provide a link to further info?
Dave
__________________
Jan, 1975: Right I/O, followed by RPLND
Dec, 2009: Left I/O, followed by 3xBEP
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-26-10, 05:07 AM
TCdoc's Avatar
TCdoc TCdoc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 190
The authors of ref 7 say in their results

"Among 257 assessable patients, 124 and 122 patients achieved a favorable response in the 3BEP and 4EP arms, respectively (P = 0.34). Median follow-up was 53 months. The 4-year event-free survival rates were 91% and 86%, respectively (P = 0.135). The 4-year overall survival rates were not significantly different [five deaths versus 12 deaths, respectively (P = 0.096)]. Similar nonsignificant trends were observed in good IGCCCG prognosis patients."

They do say, however, that BEP should be first line therapy which it is.

http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/con...e2=tf_ipsecsha
__________________
16 Dec 09 2.7 cm mass
18 Dec 09 Right I/O
Mixed germ cell - EC, chorio, seminoma
5 Jan 10 CT scan - negative; Stage 1b
3 Mar 10 CT scan - positive nodes; Stage IIa
29th March to 11th June 4xEP
Neutropenic sepsis after cycle 4 of EP
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-27-10, 02:19 AM
Davepet's Avatar
Davepet Davepet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCdoc View Post
[five deaths versus 12 deaths, respectively (P = 0.096)]. Similar nonsignificant trends were observed in good IGCCCG prognosis patients."
http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/con...e2=tf_ipsecsha
I realize I'm not really up on statistics, but it seems to me that over twice as many deaths in similar sized groups should be significant. While there *is* potential for lung damage with bleo, it is also not all that common, I'm told. I guess it's all about which gamble you feel more comfortable with...

Dave
__________________
Jan, 1975: Right I/O, followed by RPLND
Dec, 2009: Left I/O, followed by 3xBEP
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-26-10, 05:09 AM
Paul54's Avatar
Paul54 Paul54 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Age: 57
Posts: 1,583
Dr. Nichols experience and opinions aside, some centers of excellence like Memorial Sloan Kettering in New York clearly prefer 4xEP, primarily due to the lung toxicity of the Bleo. Large studies show that 3xBEP and 4xEP are equally effective over the long term.
__________________
Diagnosis: 05Sept07 Right I/O: 13Sept07 Seminoma IB
Surveillance: All clear: 16Aug2010; Next check 14Feb2011=Valentine's Day

Visit my Philly 2010 LIVESTRONG Challenge Page
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bep, chemo, einhorn, horwich, nichols

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 PM.



PLEASE NOTE: Members of the TC-Cancer.com Support Forum speak from their own experiences dealing with testicular cancer and treatments such as chemotherapy. While they are valuable sources of support and experience, and many have learned much about diagnosis and treatment, they are not physicians. Only a doctor can provide accurate diagnosis and treatment advice for your particular situation.

Use of this website means you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. If you do not agree, please close this window to exit the website.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2001 - 2010, TC-Cancer.com - Testicular Cancer Information and Support