
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Alternatives to 3xBEP in Good Prognosis GCT-You Bet Your Life-Editorial
Many of us continue participating in the forum for, among other reasons, the hope of being able to rejoice at the discovery of breakthoughs in diagnosis and treatment that would reduce suffering and save lives. Most of the time, though, we are thankful that treatments exist that help keep the survival rate to 95%. The below link is to an editorial, which I think is accessible without any sort of login by a friend of the TC community, Dr. Craig Nichols, that confirms that 3xBEP is state-of-the-art. While I hope I don't have to endure any chemo, there is some satisfaction that it is there if I need it. Note references to work by Drs. Einhorn, Jewett, and Horwich, including some recent papers.
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/djq266v1
__________________
Diagnosis: 05Sept07 Right I/O: 13Sept07 Seminoma IB Surveillance: All clear: 16Aug2010; Next check 14Feb2011=Valentine's Day Visit my Philly 2010 LIVESTRONG Challenge Page
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Paul - thank you very much for finding and posting this. I believe the article has big implications for the forum. Specifically, we always tell people that 3xBEP and 4xEP are equally effective, but Dr Nichols disagrees:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Nick Embryonal Carcinoma; Seminoma. Right I/O August 2001. Surveillance August - December 2001. Relapse: December 2001. Stage III, mets in lymph nodes and lung. 3xBEP Dec 2001 - March 2002. Complications: Neutropaenic sepsis during cycles 1 & 3. I/V antibiotics and isolation. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Actually if you look at reference 7 the french authors state that there is no significant difference between x3 BEP and x4 EP.
__________________
16 Dec 09 2.7 cm mass 18 Dec 09 Right I/O Mixed germ cell - EC, chorio, seminoma 5 Jan 10 CT scan - negative; Stage 1b 3 Mar 10 CT scan - positive nodes; Stage IIa 29th March to 11th June 4xEP Neutropenic sepsis after cycle 4 of EP |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Could you provide a link to further info? Dave
__________________
Jan, 1975: Right I/O, followed by RPLND Dec, 2009: Left I/O, followed by 3xBEP |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
The authors of ref 7 say in their results
"Among 257 assessable patients, 124 and 122 patients achieved a favorable response in the 3BEP and 4EP arms, respectively (P = 0.34). Median follow-up was 53 months. The 4-year event-free survival rates were 91% and 86%, respectively (P = 0.135). The 4-year overall survival rates were not significantly different [five deaths versus 12 deaths, respectively (P = 0.096)]. Similar nonsignificant trends were observed in good IGCCCG prognosis patients." They do say, however, that BEP should be first line therapy which it is. http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/con...e2=tf_ipsecsha
__________________
16 Dec 09 2.7 cm mass 18 Dec 09 Right I/O Mixed germ cell - EC, chorio, seminoma 5 Jan 10 CT scan - negative; Stage 1b 3 Mar 10 CT scan - positive nodes; Stage IIa 29th March to 11th June 4xEP Neutropenic sepsis after cycle 4 of EP |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Dave
__________________
Jan, 1975: Right I/O, followed by RPLND Dec, 2009: Left I/O, followed by 3xBEP |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dr. Nichols experience and opinions aside, some centers of excellence like Memorial Sloan Kettering in New York clearly prefer 4xEP, primarily due to the lung toxicity of the Bleo. Large studies show that 3xBEP and 4xEP are equally effective over the long term.
__________________
Diagnosis: 05Sept07 Right I/O: 13Sept07 Seminoma IB Surveillance: All clear: 16Aug2010; Next check 14Feb2011=Valentine's Day Visit my Philly 2010 LIVESTRONG Challenge Page
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| bep, chemo, einhorn, horwich, nichols |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|